Alfa Romeo 147 2005 vs Opel Astra 2004

 
Alfa Romeo 147
2005 - 2007
Opel Astra
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 120 HP105 HP
Torque: 146 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds12.3 seconds
Alfa Romeo 147 is more dynamic to drive.
Alfa Romeo 147 engine produces 15 HP more power than Opel Astra, but torque is 4 NM less than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 147 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.26.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 147 could require 255 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway960 km on highway
700 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Astra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Astra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Alfa Romeo 156Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Meriva
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Alfa Romeo 147 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.25 m
Width: 1.73 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 147 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 147 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 292 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1042 litres1330 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 147 has 88 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 288 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 147 is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Alfa Romeo 147 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`740 kg1`740 kg
Net weight:1`225 kg1`165 kg
Load capacity:515 kg575 kg
Alfa Romeo 147 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Opel Astra. Therefore, Opel Astra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 147 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001200
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 147 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv