Alfa Romeo 147 2001 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo 147 engine produces 5 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 147 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.7 | |
| Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 147 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 290'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo Spider | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo 147 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 147 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 147 is 11 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 145, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 147 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 147 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 147 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 147 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Alfa Romeo 147 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Alfa Romeo 147 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Alfa Romeo 147, so Alfa Romeo 147 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 147 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |