Alfa Romeo 147 2001 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Alfa Romeo 147) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Almera) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 147 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 147 engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 147 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 147 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 147 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo 147 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 147 is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 147 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1100 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 147 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 147 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Alfa Romeo 147 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 147 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 147 has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |