Alfa Romeo 145 1994 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo 145 engine produces 17 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Rover 200. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 145 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 145 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger. Alfa Romeo 145 is 12 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1086 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo 145 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |