Alfa Romeo 145 1997 vs Rover 200 1996

 
Alfa Romeo 145
1997 - 1999
Rover 200
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP112 HP
Torque: 144 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 145 engine produces 8 HP more power than Rover 200, but torque is 1 NM less than Rover 200. Despite the higher power, Alfa Romeo 145 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.27.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 145 could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway890 km on highway
580 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.09 m3.97 m
Width: 1.71 m1.69 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger.
Alfa Romeo 145 is 12 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres304 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1086 litres
Alfa Romeo 145 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 200.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6851`510
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 4200no data
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 145 has
  • more power
Rover 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv