Alfa Romeo 145 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 145 engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 145 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 145 could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 145 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 145 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |