Alfa Romeo 145 1999 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998

 
Alfa Romeo 145
1999 - 2000
Suzuki Baleno
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP96 HP
Torque: 124 NM134 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds11.2 seconds
Alfa Romeo 145 engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Baleno, but torque is 10 NM less than Suzuki Baleno.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 145 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway830 km on highway
620 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.06 m3.90 m
Width: 1.71 m1.69 m
Height: 1.43 m1.40 m
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger.
Alfa Romeo 145 is 16 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1130 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Alfa Romeo 145 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6551`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Suzuki Baleno has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Suzuki Baleno, so Suzuki Baleno quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 145 has
  • more power
Suzuki Baleno has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv