Audi A4
Audi A4 technical data
Select Audi A4 generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Audi A4 a reliable car?
Audi A4 is a reliable car. In terms of the number of defects found during annual inspections, the Audi A4 scores better than 65% of other cars of a similar age tested.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Audi A4 generation produced from 1999 to 2001 received the highest reliability ratings, while the models produced from 1995 to 1999 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Audi A4. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Audi A4 reviews
Total 106 Audi A4 owner reviews
Pros: I can bet that when it was new it delighted its owner over a long period, because although the interior is plastic it does not give the impression of cheapness. The boot is also very well made and lined. The 2.0 petrol engine has a strange sound but one cannot complain about its power. If you push the accelerator pedal into the floor, the car doesn't let you down.
Cons: Compared to the Audi 80, the seats are quite firm. The interior upholstery used too much soft plastic, which was getting worn.
2.0 engine sound peculiar. Traction sufficient. Terrible lot of front and rear joints which are not the cheapest to replace. Although the car is not a computer, but the computer system is glitching. Makes the fan work even though the temperature controller is new and not damaged. Anyway, it throws out the bits that only an electrician can remove and they are all extra costs.
Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 832 € (~ 208 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good daily car for all generations with a classic design doesn't look out of date. Works well on engine and gearbox, an economic one.
Cons: Too small salon for like large car. Sitting is not comfortable in second row. The low roof disturb longer people sit in second line, However, lowering chairs in car can easily transform it for sleeping, creates a smooth surface. Our car had problems with heating in winter. A typical problem for current model - expires rear door window wiper motor.
Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 19 years) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 390 € (~ 390 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Quite roomy boot and glove box. Handles comfortably and is quite enjoyable to jiggle around potholes. Good sound system. 74kw engine pulls decently to 100km/h (probably chipped). Good turning circle. Still a clean modern look.
Cons: Few compartments for belongings. No air conditioning for rear passengers. Very little space for rear passengers (much less than in the A6 of the same year).
Purchase year: | 2019 age of car 17 years) | Owned for | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.8 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 250 € |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Economical, dynamic, robust, no problems if serviced on time.
Cons: Not enough space for people sitting at the back. Keep an eye on the oil pump drive hex, I would recommend changing it at 50,000 km, as these engines have problems starting from not changing it in time - pressure drops, then there is a chain reaction - eventually the turbine goes out, camshaft and soot filter.
Purchase year: | 2020 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 53`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.3 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 530 € (~ 176 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Flexible, powerful, for its age quite contemporary and stylish, excellent steering, quality at very high levels - as absence of rust, engine works like a clock, suspension quite effectively withstand Latvian roads. Spare parts, compared to other cars, are quite cheap. I am really satisfied with this car
Cons: Fuel consumption and automatic gearbox operation
Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 20 years) | Owned for | 14`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 13.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Sufficient engine power and fuel spending not more than 1,8 litre Audi 80. Stability. Stainless body
Cons: The first part of suspension is from aluminium and complex. Much hinges, perishable and expensive repairs. The cabin is plastic which is of a soft material, and creates weared effect. Bugs in computer system.
Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 797 € (~ 265 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: I really like the Audi performance as a whole. I wish there were more people like me who understood that Volvo is not the only car you can buy. The Volvo V60 is like the Audi A4, so drive one and drive the other and you'd have to be a fool not to realise which one rolls! :)
Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 3`000 kilometers (0 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend