Audi 80
Audi 80 technical data
Select Audi 80 generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Audi 80 reviews
Total 64 Audi 80 owner reviews
Pros: Quattro, first car, drove for less than a year but not selling, sitting in a shed waiting to be resurrected, thought of leaving it as a second car, biggest sadness rust - boot floor arches inside and sills, but nothing tragic, since after this car have had a mk4 and currently a c5q with 2. 5tdi and now appreciate the old octo, a simple car you can rely on, nothing great from the extras - abs, hatch, heated mirrors and rear window... Manual windows, no power steering, simpler than simple, but the good old quattro system with locking rear axle is something fantastic. I think the b3 quattro will only grow in value as the years go by..
Cons: Combination of consumption and capacity
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 23 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very very good quality interior trim which does not wears off. Very soft and quiet. A reliable car. Ten years old when he lasted 13 years I travelled 100 000 km and through 13 years ago only 3 times I had to pull with a rope. Very very good car.
Cons: Small boot, but that's a small detail. The petrol pump doesn't last more than 30 000 km, but that's a small thing. It costs less than 20 euro and anyone can replace it.
| Purchase year: | 1998 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 100`000 kilometers (15 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Economical fuel consumption, cheap spare parts, easy to repair.
Cons: No air conditioning, poor lighting at night, uncomfortable seats, a lot of minor repairs, most of which are caused by old rubber guards - dust rubber, brake guide rubber, cooling system rubber, axle rubber.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 22 years) | Owned for | 84`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.4 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 849.15 $ (~ 169 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very durable, reliable, relatively simple. Inexpensive and always available spare parts.
Cons: The few space for 3 passengers on back, also in front of creature. Bottlenecks are braking track-laying.
| Purchase year: | 2010 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 100`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 715.95 $ (~ 119 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very comfortable and spacious interior, I threw my body 190 cm and 110 kg pretty comfortable at wheel. good dynamics.
Cons: Iit tastes fuel, in city of 12-14 litres, outside city 9
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 22 years) | Owned for | 7`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cheap components, cheap operation, fuel consumption OK comfort for so old car is good.
Cons: The dynamics could be better, slightly lacks capacity.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 23 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 122.1 $ | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Perfect car for country roads, rust-free and not crammed with electronics and a rough plastic interior
Cons: Cannot buy new at an affordable price
| Purchase year: | 2007 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 190`000 kilometers (12 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend