Volvo C30
Volvo C30 technical data
Select Volvo C30 generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Volvo C30 a reliable car?
The Volvo C30 is not a very reliable car. 70% of other cars of the same age are found to have fewer defects than the Volvo C30 in annual roadworthiness tests.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Volvo C30 generation produced from 2006 to 2010 received the highest reliability ratings, but overall the reliability scores of all tested Volvo C30 generations are quite similar.
Volvo C30 reviews
Total 9 Volvo C30 owner reviews
Pros: After 17 years and 430,000 km of driving, I am not exaggerating at all when I say that the engine, still all original, works like the first day. Its progressive acceleration giving the kick from 2000 rpm, its recovery from very low revs, its smooth driving without perceiving after 430,000 km any kind of vibration or noise other than the engine's own. Without any type of breakdowns except for the wear and tear that comes with its kilometres, such as: two timing belts, rear wheel bearings and the clutch kit because I noticed some noise when changing low gears, not due to engine response when the car reached 300,000 km. And to finish, its sunroof and its r-design version together with its orinoco blue colour is still stealing glances, attractive as the first day.
Cons: Absolutely nothing negative can be said.
| Purchase year: | 2007 new car) | Owned for | 430`000 kilometers (17 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.1 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1000 € (~ 58 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very, very comfortable car! It easily and comfortably could carry 4 people. The little trunk isn't THAT little, it can be filled for roadtrip for weeks and there still remains some space. A fuel-efficient car. The ideal city car, but with all low chassis can drive along forest roads. A matter of taste, but overall, cool, compliment car.
Cons: Repairs, compared with other brands, are expensive and time-consuming. Details may have to wait. Not all masters are ready to help. The big and small, regular maintenance is also pricey - oil, filters around 120EUR.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.8 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1330 € (~ 1330 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable seat, comfortable, pleasant ride. A quality car, expensive to look at, in the best sense of the word. A feeling of security in a Volvo. Easy to drive and park due to its small dimensions!
Cons: Quite low, you have to be careful crossing speed bumps :)
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 100`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Low fuel consumption, inexpensive, good-looking car. Repair costs - low
Cons: 2,0D could be stronger
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 27`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.9 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 100 € (~ 100 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 8 years) | Owned for | 25`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2050 € (~ 2050 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Interesting design
Cons: High fuel consumption.