Toyota Auris 2015 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (new car) | Owned for: | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Love atmospheric engine, suspension, handling, comfortable front seats, a large luggage compartment, place a full-size spare wheel, fuel consumption, informative rear-view mirrors. The car is made for atmospheric engine and good (bit stiff) suspension lovers.
Cons: Cabin ergonomics and sound insulation. Baggage compartment lining (soft and crumbly), wired connections (under bonnet) - beneath contempt. Poor transparency (far corner of front and back), a narrow rear door aperture. This car bonkers those drivers who puts cabin ergonomics and logical solutions are first place.
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 12`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.2 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 800 € (~ 400 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: In my opinion, resale value is more stable than Ford cars.
Starting price is lower than other popular brands.
Cons: Sound insulation poor.
In order to fit the manufacturer's stated fuel consumption, I have to think hard about driving, no matter how much I roll, I have failed completely.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (new car) | Owned for: | 109`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 385 € (~ 192 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very durable suspension, sympathetic design
Cons: Terribly weak door insulation, dust comes in absolutely everywhere, bad optics, low clearance, fuel consumption almost 2x higher than manufacturers indicated.
| Purchase year: | 2023 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 17`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.3 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Overall, a positive driving experience, with slightly too little space in the back
Cons: Fuel consumption higher than specified
| Purchase year: | 2016 (new car) | Owned for: | 1`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: It is all very positive :)
Cons: Could be more space at rear seats.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (new car) | Owned for: | 12`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.2 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Cons: Poor noise insulation of a wheel arch
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 52`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Economical
Cons: Too low