Toyota Auris
Toyota Auris technical data
Please choose Toyota Auris generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Is Toyota Auris a reliable car?
Toyota Auris is a reliable car. In terms of the number of defects found during annual inspections, the Toyota Auris scores better than 70% of other cars of a similar age tested.
Based on these reviews, the highest reliability scores were demonstrated by Toyota Auris generation from 2013 to 2015, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2015 (which were in any case better than the average reliability for cars of this age), but overall the reliability scores of all tested Toyota Auris generations are quite similar.
Most Toyota Auris engines utilize a timing chain drive, which is widely regarded as more dependable compared to engines with a timing belt drive.
Toyota Auris reviews
Total 19 Toyota Auris owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Love atmospheric engine, suspension, handling, comfortable front seats, a large luggage compartment, place a full-size spare wheel, fuel consumption, informative rear-view mirrors. The car is made for atmospheric engine and good (bit stiff) suspension lovers.
Cons: Cabin ergonomics and sound insulation. Baggage compartment lining (soft and crumbly), wired connections (under bonnet) - beneath contempt. Poor transparency (far corner of front and back), a narrow rear door aperture. This car bonkers those drivers who puts cabin ergonomics and logical solutions are first place.
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 12`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.2 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 800 € (~ 400 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: In my opinion, resale value is more stable than Ford cars.
Starting price is lower than other popular brands.
Cons: Sound insulation poor.
In order to fit the manufacturer's stated fuel consumption, I have to think hard about driving, no matter how much I roll, I have failed completely.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 109`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 385 € (~ 192 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very durable suspension, sympathetic design
Cons: Terribly weak door insulation, dust comes in absolutely everywhere, bad optics, low clearance, fuel consumption almost 2x higher than manufacturers indicated.
| Purchase year: | 2023 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 17`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.3 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Overall, a positive driving experience, with slightly too little space in the back
Cons: Fuel consumption higher than specified
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 3 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.4 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 55 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very gentle and stable on road.
Cons: Sound insulation of engine room is bad.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 21`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good car, eat little fuel, roomy, safe on road
Cons: You can ask for better sound insulation