Renault Scenic
Renault Scenic technical data
Select Renault Scenic generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Renault Scenic a reliable car?
The Renault Scenic is not a very reliable car. 75% of other cars of the same age are found to have fewer defects than the Renault Scenic in annual roadworthiness tests.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Renault Scenic generation from 2009 to 2012, while the models produced from 2003 to 2006 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Renault Scenic. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Renault Scenic reviews
Total 23 Renault Scenic owner reviews
Pros: Good visibility. Very good turns in parking spaces. Once every two years I repair suspension. Once disappeared panel lighting, and as for Renault turbine failed. Repairs have not been any longer. Very comfortable. Especially on long journeys. Roomy. Children are comfortable in back. I love it!
Cons: There is nothing terribly negative. Fewer problems than with Audi, Mazda and Opels that I had owned. Only now the engine is starting to eat oil, but not terribly much.
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 488.4 $ (~ 162 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: It's the best SUV I've ever owned. It has taken me all over the country for 19 years... two repairs without letting the car wear out, a total paint change and come on, it's a blast! The best thing: the possibility to remove all the back seats and it becomes a van... it fits everything, with dogs and cats!
Cons: Nothing. It's all about preventive maintenance and not waiting for it to deteriorate.
| Purchase year: | 2005 new car) | Owned for | 190`000 kilometers (19 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.1 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good price / quality ratio for used car.
Supereconomical up to 70 km/h (3-4 l). At 100 km/h consumption rises a bit - around 4,7 l/100 km.
High sitting position, rear seats can be removed even by one.
Great capacity, though only 4,26 m in length.
Cons: On bad road rumbles through an interior trim element. Limited visibility
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 12`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 549.45 $ (~ 549 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy. An economic one. Many extras. Cheap to buy.
Cons: Everything breaking, not just electronics. I had to change everything - engine, clutch kit, electronics, etc. Worses are 10x more.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 70`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1598.4 $ (~ 799 $ per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable interior, radio sounds quite good!
Cons: If you need repairs, costs of very high. Details are very expensive mainly to get everything secondhand.
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 60`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1554 $ (~ 388 $ per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good to go in all weather conditions and on different surfaces, economical, comfortable and convenient
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 586.08 $ (~ 586 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Even no signs of corrosion!
Cons: Only fuel consumption could be smaller, and not for Latvian rural roads.
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 6 years) | Owned for | 150`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2064.6 $ (~ 229 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend