Opel Insignia
Opel Insignia technical data
Please choose Opel Insignia generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Is Opel Insignia a reliable car?
In general, the Opel Insignia reliability is slightly below average. The number of defects found on the Opel Insignia during the annual technical inspections is just above average for cars of a similar age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Opel Insignia generation from 2008 to 2013, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2017 to 2020.
Opel Insignia reviews
Total 18 Opel Insignia owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 11`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The car was new, so no problems. Comfortable, powerful. Economical. On a 5200 km trip around Europe with a full car, including a German bahn where speeds were often around 150-170 km/h, average consumption was 7l. Moderately rolling around Latvia up to 90 km/h, consumption stayed under 5l. I was a pleasure to drive
Cons: Pretty poor sound insulation. Especially at the rear, as for a universal
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 110`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.7 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 270 € (~ 270 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A handsome car. During year, has not asked for specific investments.
Cons: The seats are uncomfortable, loud, as a station wagon rear door round arches so impractical.
| Purchase year: | 2021 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.7 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1910 € (~ 955 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good, strong suspension, spacious interior
Cons: Changing the small rubber seal on the oil pump in the crankcase makes the whole engine more expensive to run
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 77`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.2 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 100 € (~ 20 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, well controlled, reliable, IMHO the prettier station wagon
Cons: It is not largest capacity in its class, if this is important
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 350 € (~ 175 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good and good-looking car for ordinary Latvian.
Cons: It could have been quieter. The manual box very inflexible for urban driving.
| Purchase year: | 2021 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.9 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Overall, comfortable and convenient, with reasonable consumption.
Cons: The gearbox could be a little softer.
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 242`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Excellent power and comfortable ride. Beautiful car.
Cons: Omega had a bigger trunk