Opel Insignia
Opel Insignia technical data
Please choose Opel Insignia generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Opel Insignia reviews
Total 18 Opel Insignia owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 11`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The car was new, so no problems. Comfortable, powerful. Economical. On a 5200 km trip around Europe with a full car, including a German bahn where speeds were often around 150-170 km/h, average consumption was 7l. Moderately rolling around Latvia up to 90 km/h, consumption stayed under 5l. I was a pleasure to drive
Cons: Pretty poor sound insulation. Especially at the rear, as for a universal
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 110`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.7 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 270 € (~ 270 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A handsome car. During year, has not asked for specific investments.
Cons: The seats are uncomfortable, loud, as a station wagon rear door round arches so impractical.
| Purchase year: | 2021 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.7 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1910 € (~ 955 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good, strong suspension, spacious interior
Cons: Changing the small rubber seal on the oil pump in the crankcase makes the whole engine more expensive to run
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 77`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.2 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 100 € (~ 20 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, well controlled, reliable, IMHO the prettier station wagon
Cons: It is not largest capacity in its class, if this is important
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 350 € (~ 175 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good and good-looking car for ordinary Latvian.
Cons: It could have been quieter. The manual box very inflexible for urban driving.
| Purchase year: | 2021 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.9 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Overall, comfortable and convenient, with reasonable consumption.
Cons: The gearbox could be a little softer.
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 242`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Excellent power and comfortable ride. Beautiful car.
Cons: Omega had a bigger trunk