Opel Frontera
Opel Frontera technical data
Select Opel Frontera generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Opel Frontera a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Opel Frontera is average. The number of defects found on the Opel Frontera during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Opel Frontera generation from 1995 to 1998, while the models produced from 1998 to 2004 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Opel Frontera. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Most Opel Frontera are equipped with timing belt engines, which are generally considered less reliable than timing chain engines.
Opel Frontera reviews
Total 5 Opel Frontera owner reviews
Pros: This particular Frontera is probably better than that of Frontera 2 (second is a fractious engine). When engine is followed by and maintained, it serves long and well. It is not fanciful to fuel, takes everything. In winter, jumping from half a revolution in -25C, indeed, if battery is capable of generating enough power. I love this engine gas distribution mechanism shall be recovered through gears. Therefore, no need to change gear belt, which pays some cars expensive or problems with chains that tends to be worn with time. As a whole car is a very tough because parts are made profound. I've been through offroads. Trafficability, for standard car is brilliant. This car has a fully fledged four-wheel drive with which it is also reduced mode. Even recently, several times I drove through 8 km long off-road stage where UAZ failed two times.
Cons: Negative as a matter of principle, is small details. Firstly hubs, needed to change to mechanical. It is characteristic of brake calliper control stucking (they once a year should be cleaned and oiled). Is thought to be out of engine oil pressure sensor. I can't say anything more bad for over four years usage.
| Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 15 years) | Owned for | 115`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1237.65 $ (~ 309 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very tough, robust car, but almoust maintaince free, bullet proof engine, good in the city, on open roads or forrest, good fuel consuption for these type of car. Very good loking car after all these years, working horse.
Cons: Underpowered engine ( 2.3td ),air leaking in the fuel system, don´t have diff. block and worse problem - there is no spare parts ny more in Croatia; every spare part is big problem.
| Purchase year: | 2007 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 70`000 kilometers (13 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1332 $ (~ 102 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 200`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Great trafficability, real offroader
| Purchase year: | 2011 age of car 17 years) | Owned for | 80`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (10% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 344.1 $ (~ 68 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Real off-road vehicle.
Cons: Rust and rust