Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 reviews
Pros: A wide range of interior, good drivability, fuel consumption for 4x4 normal
Cons: There might be quieter inside, on a bumpy track rattling muffler, back cover could rise higher, complex fuel filter change
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Quality appropriate price. Although, paradoxically, inside much bigger and comfortable than Mitsubishi Pajero.
Cons: In general, reliable car, just find it annoying that new procured vehicle at approximately 50 thousand mileage had to change brake control, and dealer's reserved attitude that it is all this specific producer model problem.
| Purchase year: | 2011 new car) | Owned for | 76`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 350 € (~ 70 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A neat family car. Simple construction, therefore cheap to operate. More city cars than long journeys.
Cons: The city has a high consumption of about 10 liters. Slightly hard running, especially on bumpy roads. Soft body color, so quickly scratched.
| Purchase year: | 2019 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 25`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A normal car
Cons: It could be a bit quieter at speeds above 110 km / h
| Purchase year: | 2010 new car) | Owned for | 140`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2024 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 3`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Never left me on road, drives like a clock
Cons: After first 3 years and 60 000 km every year to invest in for repair around 1000 EUR
| Purchase year: | 2009 new car) | Owned for | 167`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Normal car, stable and responsive, engine is robust, confident enough off-road due to high ground clearance.
Cons: The rust ate it, after a little accident when the tractor was pulling me out of the drift, the whole radiator came out of the rope pull with all the fasteners and other bits that were in the way. Japanese metal and a lifetime of car in LV - rust ate the whole underside.
| Purchase year: | 2022 age of car 15 years) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend