Mercedes V class
| Year | Lowest ($) | Average ($) | Highest ($) | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 price | 107 500 | 107 500 | 107 500 | |
| 2023 price | 101 500 | 102 000 | 102 500 | |
| 2022 price | 72 000 | 84 500 | 97 500 | |
| 2021 price | 52 000 | 61 500 | 66 500 | |
| 2020 price | 57 500 | 63 000 | 67 000 | |
| 2019 price | 62 000 | 64 500 | 67 000 | |
| 2018 price | 34 500 | 41 000 | 44 500 | |
| 2017 price | 40 000 | 45 500 | 51 500 | |
| 2016 price | 31 500 | 35 500 | 41 500 | |
| 2015 price | 29 500 | 32 500 | 34 500 | |
| 2014 price | 31 000 | 34 500 | 36 500 | |
| 2004 price | 2200 | 3800 | 5500 | |
| 2003 price | 3900 | 4200 | 4900 | |
| 2002 price | 2200 | 2700 | 3100 | |
| 2001 price | 2200 | 2700 | 3300 | |
| 2000 price | 1200 | 3200 | 6000 | |
| 1999 price | 800 | 1700 | 3300 | |
| 1998 price | 2100 | 2900 | 3600 | |
| 1997 price | 1000 | 1400 | 2200 | |
| 1996 price | 3400 | 3800 | 4100 |
Mercedes V class reviews
Total 6 Mercedes V class owner reviews
Pros: Very comfortable, sympathetic (my wife drives it proudly), stable on the road, performance (500Nm of torque, e.g. XC60 only 380Nm at 60 hp more). You won't be left in the woods or on a sand dune. It has been tested on many reasonable off-roads. More agile on start-up than XC60 D5. One of the best overtaking buses, no need to worry you won't make it.
If you have the money, I recommend this one! The Burmeister sound system sounds excellent (better than B&O and BOSE), but of course with Hi-Fidelity files.
On long distances without actually running you can get that 6,2L/100km!
Cons: Expensive explutation costs if you want original parts and something goes wrong.
| Purchase year: | 2021 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 26`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.3 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 3885 $ (~ 1942 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A comfortable, stable on road. Governable. You can use both carriage of goods and family trips.
Cons: Expensive repair costs associated with electricity.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 743.7 $ (~ 743 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: comfortable, soft, good hanger, a good family and sight-seeing car
Cons: rust
| Purchase year: | 2003 new car) | Owned for | 250`000 kilometers (13 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.6 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 832.5 $ (~ 64 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, soft, great car
Cons: If would not rust, drive up to 1000000
| Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 300`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 3219 $ (~ 357 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend