Mercedes ML
Mercedes ML technical data
Select Mercedes ML generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Mercedes ML a reliable car?
In general, the Mercedes ML reliability is slightly below average. The number of defects found on the Mercedes ML during the annual technical inspections is just above average for cars of a similar age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Mercedes ML generation from 2011 , while the models produced from 2001 to 2005 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Mercedes ML. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Most Mercedes ML engines utilize a timing chain drive, which is widely regarded as more dependable compared to engines with a timing belt drive.
Mercedes ML reviews
Total 17 Mercedes ML owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 17 years) | Owned for: | 9`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.1 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1028 € (~ 514 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfort, safety, perfect visibility - very important at my age. Easy to get in and out of, very good relaxed driving feel, few electronics, generally quite a simple car
Cons: To get your car in order you should invest like a Mercedes, premium spare parts cost money. It's hard to find a good technician who knows the model, there are specifics.
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 600 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Car is cosy and it is a pleasure to drive it! Very high-end materials, even after nine years of use interior looks good and no signs of fatigue.
Cons: I'd suggest to choose a "facelift" models starting from 2009 and later
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 19 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 14.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 500 € (~ 125 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: If you don't try to finish the car yourself, then everything is much less serviceable, roomy and compact
Cons: Poor sound insulation, below average interior quality, some ergonomic issues, rear suspension stiffness
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 20 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 18.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very good for special snow and mud mount. Very comfortable
Cons: The consumption I hope to pass it to gas
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: In general is not a bad car, like fact that it has lowered gears
Cons: Power could be better
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 330 € (~ 82 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: This is a Mercedes. That's it.
Cons: Maybe a little too big
| Purchase year: | 2022 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 790 € (~ 395 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A very dynamic and comfortable car.
Cons: Poor low-beams.