Mercedes C class
Mercedes C class technical data
Select Mercedes C class generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Mercedes C class a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Mercedes C class is average. The number of defects found on the Mercedes C class during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Mercedes C class generation produced from 2013 received the highest reliability ratings, while the models produced from 2004 to 2007 had the lowest reliability ratings, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Mercedes C class. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Most Mercedes C class engines utilize a timing chain drive, which is widely regarded as more dependable compared to engines with a timing belt drive.
Mercedes C class reviews
Total 33 Mercedes C class owner reviews
Pros: Good engine, 220km/h on the German Autobahn, easy to drive, handles well on the road, no weaving in corners, sports alcantara seats, holds the back well, no problems with the gearbox
Cons: Not recommended for taller than 185, not too comfortable to get in as the ceiling is quite low, no handbrake lever can't drift but generally relaxing to drive on good tarmac for long distances, now started to drip a bit of coolant, will have to replace the gasket
| Purchase year: | 2020 age of car 6 years) | Owned for | 15`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: It is a fantastic car. Very brisk, responsive, submissive and economical. In summer have had to go with fuel consumption 4.2 litres on 100km. (engine capacity 2.2) Quickly picks up speed to overtake. Motor starts at -20 degrees without problems. It is a machine with whom I would like to see a hoary old age.
Cons: The only drawback - could be better heating.
| Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.2 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very durable suspension designed for potholed roads, high reliability, easy and comfortable riding, perfect cabin trim quality, do not rattles on potholed country lanes over years, quiet interior, great lighting.
Cons: At age and rust, cramped, demanding more powerfull engine, but for mundane enough. Problems with windscreen-wiper mechanism.
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 100`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (10% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1406 € (~ 200 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Precise handling, good materials, good light from lamps, carefully assembled, all intended working, good, quiet engine.
Cons: Complex wheel suspension, low space, hard to maintain fabric of seats, not synchronized reverse gear.
| Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 136`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A small but roomy. Despite mileage 270 000 could experience comfort
Cons: Fuel consumption in city at a small travel is a larger, because engine not warming up
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 25`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2920 € (~ 2920 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Inexpensive spare parts, durable running gear.
Cons: The relatively narrow interior, rear drive - hard to go through bad in humid weather.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 23 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable large family car, low fuel consumption, pleasant driving, never has failed on road.
Cons: Slight rust spots.
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 5 years) | Owned for | 180`000 kilometers (8 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1200 € (~ 150 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend