Mercedes C class
Mercedes C class technical data
Please choose Mercedes C class generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Mercedes C class reviews
Total 31 Mercedes C class owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 60 € (~ 30 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good engine, 220km/h on the German Autobahn, easy to drive, handles well on the road, no weaving in corners, sports alcantara seats, holds the back well, no problems with the gearbox
Cons: Not recommended for taller than 185, not too comfortable to get in as the ceiling is quite low, no handbrake lever can't drift but generally relaxing to drive on good tarmac for long distances, now started to drip a bit of coolant, will have to replace the gasket
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.6 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 125 € (~ 125 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 13 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (10% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1406 € (~ 200 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very durable suspension designed for potholed roads, high reliability, easy and comfortable riding, perfect cabin trim quality, do not rattles on potholed country lanes over years, quiet interior, great lighting.
Cons: At age and rust, cramped, demanding more powerfull engine, but for mundane enough. Problems with windscreen-wiper mechanism.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 12 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.2 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 50 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: It is a fantastic car. Very brisk, responsive, submissive and economical. In summer have had to go with fuel consumption 4.2 litres on 100km. (engine capacity 2.2) Quickly picks up speed to overtake. Motor starts at -20 degrees guide without problems. It is a machine with whom I would like to see a hoary old age.
Cons: The only drawback - could be better heating.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 136`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 185 € (~ 46 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Precise handling, good materials, good light from lamps, carefully assembled, all intended working, good, quiet engine.
Cons: Complex wheel suspension, low space, hard to maintain fabric of seats, not synchronized reverse gear.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 25`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2920 € (~ 2920 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A small but roomy. Despite mileage 270 000 could experience comfort
Cons: Fuel consumption in city at a small travel is a larger, because engine not warming up
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1300 € (~ 650 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend