Honda Civic
Honda Civic technical data
Please choose Honda Civic generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Is Honda Civic a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Honda Civic is average. The number of defects found on the Honda Civic during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Honda Civic generation produced from 2003 to 2005 received the highest reliability ratings, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2001 to 2003, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Honda Civic. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Honda Civic reviews
Total 24 Honda Civic owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 25`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Visually attractive and stylish, even beautiful:) Mild, comfortable interior Good original audio system, Roomy trunk by folding chairs can sleep in car.:)
Cons: Rear visibility is not so good because of the design of the rear window, but you get used to it, very quickly.
Probably quite low, you have to drive more sensibly, but you get used to it
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 185`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.1 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 240 € (~ 48 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Petrol / gas, from Italy. The only downside - the gas equipment is put in Italy and here in Latvia no one can connect to the brain of this type of equipment (started switching itself from petrol and gas). All this time since I have used the car, I have done nothing more (nothing !!!) than brake maintenance (replacement of pads, discs)! And they are around 185,000 km!
Cons: A bit of a rattling of panel, but this is probably due to the fact that the car has been damaged. Rear view camera turns on slowly
| Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 7 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 330 € (~ 47 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good safe, durable car. Comfortable seating, luggage capacity is also great, lowering chairs have driven a lot of long boards.
I had VW, Ford, Opel and another one Honda - Honda is 10x better than others. I don't service this car very accurately, taking it to mechanic only when something fails completely, but it serves me very well.
| Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 13`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2075 € (~ 296 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 205 € (~ 102 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Little is spent on fuel - an economic one. If car is being regularly maintained (oil changes, filters, etc.) are not so much need to invest in repairs.
| Purchase year: | 1997 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (26 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 350 € (~ 13 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.2 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Robust, technically reliable. A great design for the year. Good handling, firm on the road. Relatively spacious interior, also in the rear, capacity good enough for this class.
Cons: Lots of plastic parts on the outside, which are low and easy to wrap. Repairs are not very cheap. Suspension relatively hard, but it gives good handling.