Dacia Dokker
Dacia Dokker technical data
Select Dacia Dokker generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Dacia Dokker a reliable car?
The Dacia Dokker is not a reliable car, it regularly ranks near the bottom of car reliability ratings and is outperformed by 100% of other cars in terms of the number of defects found during annual inspections.
Based on annual roadworthiness tests results, the Dacia Dokker generation produced from 2012 to 2015 received the highest reliability ratings, but overall the reliability scores of all tested Dacia Dokker generations are quite similar.
Most Dacia Dokker are equipped with timing belt engines, which are generally considered less reliable than timing chain engines.
Dacia Dokker reviews
Total 7 Dacia Dokker owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2018 (new car) | Owned for: | 16`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Positive is music playback from USB and cruise control.
Cons: The car is not a comfortable, very big noise in the cabin. The start stop system is the ultimate shit, at the neutral it shuts down engine without pushing the brakes. The car is half a year old with a mileage of 16,000 after the first winter began to rust arches, and rust points across the all body. And there is already one shock absorber leaking. The painting is so terrible that I fear of touching it, it's very easy to scratch. Very sorry for I bought this car! Needlessly discarded money. This car wouldn't even recommend to your enemy !!!!!
| Purchase year: | 2018 (new car) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Spacious! Pretty high to ride for mushrooms! :) As a household car, perfect! Warranty service and responsiveness from the service staff ok!
Cons: Gas unit - complete manure! If the winter is cold, the feet are frosted with a guarantee! Factory-fitted cabin assembly - low quality. In some places, the interior trim was not even screwed on.
The rubber of the door falls off, I got to glue it myself ... even though I smeared it with an anti-freezing agent.
Stopped at the intersection, but the engine continues to roar at 2000 rpm ...
| Purchase year: | 2013 (new car) | Owned for: | 220`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.6 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Incredible engine. Simple, cheap, no breakdowns. Spacious.
Cons: Poor finish
| Purchase year: | 2018 (new car) | Owned for: | 65`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good machine, convenient, simple
| Purchase year: | 2012 (new car) | Owned for: | 32`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cheap and faithful car