Volvo XC90 1981 reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Volvo XC90.
Pros: Spacious, relatively economical.
Audio system cool.
Chairs comfortably.
Perfectly descends into a recline, put a roll up mattress and a bed ready!
Super car.
Cons: The hand brake should be used regularly to prevent stiffness
steering angle ... no comments ... to turn around, 68x must go back and forth,
could be a little softer ride
sometimes it is difficult to see pedestrians behind the edges between the front and side glasses.
| Total cost of repairs: | 880 € | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Durable on LV roads. A cool big family car
Cons: Oil leaks from the engine
| Average fuel consumption: | 15.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cost of repairs: | 250 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 10`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.6 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 400 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Travel with elegance. Comfortable, very durable. Good stereo. Pleasant driving. 7 places. For SUV - very economical.
Cons: Low maneuverability. All weight at the front, so be careful.
| Purchase year: | 2018 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 26`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 305 € (~ 305 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A very good car in every way. Cheap service. Hasn't caused any problems, not in winter or summer. The ideal car Latvian roads. No problem with used parts.
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 200`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 500 € (~ 125 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very reliable and robust, the passage of the years does not happen much
Cons: The gearbox sometimes gives a problem, you do a diagnosis, and as good as new.
| Purchase year: | 2004 new car) | Owned for | 450`000 kilometers (19 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.9 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good strong car for Latvian reads.
Cons: If starts breaking down, then expensive repair costs.
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 255 € (~ 255 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Safe, been thought through, qualitative and reliable car.
Cons: Turning radius could be lower.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 80`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend