Volkswagen Polo 2001 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 5`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 100 € (~ 100 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Fuel consumption
Cons: Rust, electronics problems concerning quality Volkswagen unfortunately have forgotten it long time ago, if any of most expensive model has something a little frustrating, then it has inadequate pay compared to other car brands
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 1 year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (100% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 70 € (~ 70 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, good beetle.
| Purchase year: | 2003 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (12 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 90`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 280 € (~ 93 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A reliable car. A lot of different locations for convenience and document storage. Drawers under chairs, retractable glass holder.
Cons: It could be more economical and more dynamic
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Repairs - only maintenance
Cons: In winter cold
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 25`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Trusted
Cons: Loud