Subaru Legacy 2009 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 199 € (~ 99 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The car invites you to tour quietly, but has enough power to drive "sporty"
Cons: Service maintenance can be a bit more expensive compared to European brands.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 185 € (~ 185 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Dynamic, comfortable car
Cons: A little too low
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Is a Subaru a Subaru!! 2.5 Turbo model, of course, consumes a bit of fuel, but performance is awsome!!
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 98`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Super suspension, sports mode enables you to perform dynamic overtaking, a big boot, in winter engine warms up quickly, 4x4 is excellent if you live in rural areas, long journeys can be driven by 7. 5l/100km at speed 90-100km / hr
Cons: 12 years rust appears, "eats" a lot - around 10-11 l / 100 km, it is recommended that you have larger discs and higher tyres
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 370 € (~ 61 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Can be driven anywhere, if timely repaired - is not expensive repairs, rolling part is perfect, simple management and maintenance, sensible driving (90-100km / h) long pieces can pass with 7 litres per 100km
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 370 € (~ 61 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Can be driven anywhere, if timely repaired - is not expensive repairs, rolling part is perfect, simple management and maintenance, sensible driving (90-100km / h) long pieces can pass with 7 litres / 100
Cons: Rust
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 0 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 250 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cheap maintenance, four-wheel drive - not many competitors