Subaru Forester 2000 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2027.97 $ (~ 405 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: All-wheel drive, clearance, good power for a turbo engine.
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 15 years) | Owned for: | 99`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1898.1 $ (~ 949 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: This car is ideal for hunting and offroad.
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Durable
Cons: nothing
| Purchase year: | 2006 (new car) | Owned for: | 56`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1887 $ (~ 188 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 14`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (10% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Stable, secure, convenient
| Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 3 years) | Owned for: | 126`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good family car
| Purchase year: | 2008 (new car) | Owned for: | 140`000 kilometers (8 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.3 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1071.15 $ (~ 133 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Excellent trafficability (snow and mud is not an obstacle), an economic engine, good dynamics, pleasant to drive on gravel roads.
Cons: Very soft in original rear suspension - to feel as bad asphalt vessel waves, sound insulation could be better, something rattles roof hatch (warranty period, blame it also could not find).