Subaru Forester 2013 reviews
Pros: Running stability gives sense of security which could not had in our previous - HONDA CRV, KIA Sorrento, ISUZU trooper and a Landcruiser. Low fuel consumption.
| Purchase year: | 2013 new car) | Owned for | 120`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: So far, no complaints about engine and rolling part.
Cons: Weak anti-rust protection. Poor painting quality.
| Purchase year: | 2014 new car) | Owned for | 98`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Cons: bad acceleration on highways
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 1 year) | Owned for | 320`000 kilometers (8 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.2 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Reliable, stable road-holding, dynamic, great all-wheel drive, good visibility, spacious interior, heated steering wheel.
Cons: Noisy interior, multimedia is dull, sound system is weak.
| Purchase year: | 2023 age of car 6 years) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 175 € (~ 175 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2017 new car) | Owned for | 70`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.3 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, manoeuvrable
Cons: Could have been quieter