Mazda 626 1988 reviews
Pros: Do not corrode, at least my model good comfort, powerful, electronics serves good, rather simple repairs. Cheap parts.
Cons: Running gear is heavy, high fuel consumption
| Purchase year: | 2002 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (14 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 170`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Practical, cheap, trustworthy, for city quite dynamic
| Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 15 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2000 age of car 5 years) | Owned for | 350`000 kilometers (16 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1580 € (~ 98 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Easy, powerful and durable.
Pros: Good for intelligent driver not longer than 195 cm, who follows traffic rules for 90% and for 110% runs at regular intervals and takes care of his car, so that it don't get chilled (only the best coolant in radiator) and overheated (oil always in level and timely changed, including filters) and on bad roads slowly, large puddles, above ankle should not be crossed.
If need to transfer washing machine or a couch or refrigerator - trunk lid like hippopotamus mouth.
Cons: Could be a bit, a little higher for Latvian roads. Could be a bit, a little economical in terms of fuel, it would be my ideal car.
| Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 100`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1410 € (~ 201 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Technically durable, easily repairable, everything can be accessed easily. It is not overloaded with electronics, just don't have a tendency to perish. A relatively roomy, practical car.
Cons: Quite susceptible to corrosion.
| Purchase year: | 2006 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 150`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Everything was very cool car, only drawback is rust and then 3 years into a bottomless pit.
Cons: The rusted completely with age
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 130`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend