Honda Accord 1998 reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Honda Accord.
Pros: Great steering feel, road holding and general driving enjoyment. Spacious, supportive seats and amazing visibility. Reliable mechanically and the interior felt more premium than its predecessor and European counterpart. Manual gearbox feels direct and pleasant to use, engine has more go than you´d expect.
Cons: No overhead light in the front, many electronics prone to failure, heating dial always fails on all of them. Rear leg room could be a bit better, steering doesn´t telescope and for taller people some buttons always feel slightly out of reach. Also the sunroof doesn´t tilt.
| Purchase year: | 2024 age of car 29 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Excellent ergonomics (with the exception of the window control placement). Very reliable, electrics almost flawless, great looks, relatively comfortable, smaller features well thought out. Great daily driver and perfect for cruising, if not the last word in driving enjoyment.
Cons: Dull as ditchwater to drive. This car may look sporty like the prelude, but the steering is dead, the steering lock is poor making maneuvering a chore and the automatic isn´t exactly smooth (though it is bulletproof).
| Purchase year: | 2024 age of car 29 years) | Owned for | 4`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, spacious, dependable
Cons: Boring - its feel not fun to drive; Very large turning radius (manoeuvrability as container ship); Poor visibility in side; Fuel consumption is not as stated;bad sound insulation
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 35`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 325 € (~ 325 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Convenient, good-looking, reliable, good drivability - have set up a Eibach springs pro kit, which made driving even more sporty and confortable. 2.0 engine accelerates feom 0 km/h to 100 km/h in 9 seconds, which is much faster, than mentioned in article here.
Cons: Regular problems with handbrake (annually), steams up lamps in front. Easy scraping bodywork - varnish soft.
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 520 € (~ 173 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A very comfortable car, a quiet engine, which works with chain, as well as a dynamic enough for daily city driving.
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 600 € (~ 300 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very nice car
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 70`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.1 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 1.8 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 235 € (~ 58 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend