Chrysler Voyager 1991 reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Chrysler Voyager.
Pros: Spacious, comfortable, good maneuverability, quiet, great capacity, good engine, suitable for LPG
Cons: Europeans are worthless, every 2 months had to go to service. All time, something bursts.
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 18 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 16.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1540 € (~ 513 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 300`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Cons: expensive
| Purchase year: | 2011 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 250`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 380 € (~ 76 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Manageable, secure, comfortable ride with kids, you can move through cabin. Easily retrievable rear seats if they need to place a large luggage. Good for a large family, is not expensive operation. Rear windows opens only from driver's position, safe for children, unable to poke out.
Cons: Rusts exhaust pipe and thresholds, at city consumption is more than 10 litres per 100km
| Purchase year: | 2010 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 180`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1360 € (~ 226 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy cargo; two rows of seats removable; Practical.
Cons: Fuel consumption could be lower; Harder to find parts
| Purchase year: | 2011 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 41`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.6 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Convenient, high, relatively stable. Maintenance is not expensive.
Cons: Salon plastic tend to rattle.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 17 years) | Owned for | 47`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: What I like a lot about the car, despite being old, is that it is very comfortable, I like the engine, the performance too.
| Purchase year: | 2019 age of car 20 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2004 age of car 5 years) | Owned for | 180`000 kilometers (12 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 3500 € (~ 291 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend