Chrysler Voyager 2004 reviews
Pros: If you are a car person who can repair it yourself, then okay, if you have to pay for it all at the service stations, then it won't be cheap. And one more opinion, buying a used car is a waste of immediate investment, because cheap and good never is and never will be. But with a bit of maintenance, like flea treatment for the dog, it's really nice to drive, it's warm, it's spacious, I'd say it's comfortable.
Cons: Quite a bit of power for such a large fuel consumption, and of course the biggest con is four speed gearbox - something from the last century.
Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 8 years) | Owned for | 18`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.6 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 980 € (~ 490 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: If looked after - a very good car for both family and trips with friends. Sitting higher - seeing better, easy to drive and do not get tired.
Cons: Poor lights
Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 115`000 kilometers (7 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.7 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very spacious and comfortable. Good lights. Cabin heating ok.
Cons: No trust. You don't know at what point it will fail and this has happened many times
Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 2440 € (~ 1220 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very spacious, comfortable, quiet car. Costs is not so expensive. It is not recommended for aggressive drivers. Slow, gentle family car.
Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very good family car. High sitting, good sight. Comfortable. Not once deceived
Cons: If stainless, it would be super
Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 90`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 10`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good car, great comfort, a very suitable for long trips.
Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 5 years) | Owned for | 60`000 kilometers (6 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 6 years) | Owned for | 250`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 4 years) | Owned for | 75`000 kilometers (6 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 410 € (~ 68 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend