Volkswagen Passat 1981 reviews
Pros: Simple design. The "native" (1.6 D) engine was very robust, but now, in the spirit of the times, a modified 1.9 TDI is fitted. It sits very well on the road and, more importantly, on slippery and icy roads. Capable and high-capacity
Cons: The original optics were lousy, but when I put on the other lights, everything was fine.
Purchase year: | 1996 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 400`000 kilometers (22 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cheap repairs, high capacity, easily manageable, perfect for work and family.
Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 30 years) | Owned for | 70`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Easily starts and cheap replacement parts. Is faithfully serving.
Cons: Failures in electrical equipment (water temperature, oil pressure sensors)
Purchase year: | 1998 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 140`000 kilometers (18 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cheap and available spare parts
Cons: Often sensors (temperature, oil pressure) failures. Cabin fan selector contacts often breaks down.
Purchase year: | 1998 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 150`000 kilometers (18 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2011 age of car 23 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (6 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 499 € (~ 83 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cough, sneezing, but going forward.
Pros: A highly durable and reliable car. Excellent, tough suspension, durable and powerful engines. Gas consumption (2. generation) - not more than 10 litres, regardless of driving style. You can adjust consumption to 8.5 l / 100km, but gas master dissuaded. Although it would be optimal for consumption, I dont took a risk to regulate.
Cons: Rust creeps through cracks - age guilty and tons of salt on roads. Ventilation control unit and door handle, is weakness of this model
Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 25 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 442 € (~ 147 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy, comfortable, large clearance (when lip has already been stripped away), costeffective, reliable.
Cons: A bit of rust, but in that age, it is no longer obvious. No conditioning. Hatch outdated gaskets, during rain remains slightly wet left seat belt.
Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 23 years) | Owned for | 80`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 270 € (~ 67 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend