Skoda Octavia 2017 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2017 (new car) | Owned for: | 110`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Value for money.
| Purchase year: | 2020 (new car) | Owned for: | 2`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.3 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Quality salon. Comfortable seats. Good FULL LED lights.
Cons: All climate control, radio, seat heating control is ONLY on the tablet ... Within 6 months of the month the touch screen was hanging or did not turn on at all - you can enjoy winter or heat in the cabin, without the ability to adjust anything ... For 21500 eur I was expecting a less problematic car ... New steering wheel - another fixture ... Small and awkward side mirrors. Front assist often works incorrectly. Disappointment about car electronic parts ...
| Purchase year: | 2020 (new car) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.6 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy, comfortable, economical, relatively good quality.
Cons: The hybrid system tends to wobble in winter.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (new car) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 72 € (~ 72 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: - Dynamics (1.6 l diesel with only 110 HP is OK);
- capacity;
- consumption (real on Highway 4.5 -4.9 litres per 100 km);
- driver comfort
Cons: - a new car has a terrible cabin sound insulation - like to sit inside drum beat, bloody ears, particularly bad is interior fittings;
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 132`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Cons: the salon could have been quieter
| Purchase year: | 2019 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.3 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2014 (new car) | Owned for: | 74`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Leader in its price category. Very adequate equipment for their money. Drives well, easy to steer and close speeds. Power good, did not lag behind C6 3.0d. Fantastic lights (bixenon) were worth the surcharge. Ergonomic interior layout, everything is handy and easy to use, only useful info appears on the screens and not some nonsense. The car is not big but the shape of the cabin is such that it can be loaded almost everything.
Cons: So far, only the oil is changing, but the flywheel is already making itself known. In addition, there is a small oil leak and the front shock absorbers are wet.
I (187cm) did not like the sitting position. A little too narrow, as well as when climbing in and out, should rub against the awkwardly placed column. Suspension too soft, on larger bumps go to rebound, a lot of swaying.