Renault Grand Espace 2006 reviews
Pros: Consumption 4l/100 on the highway at 80km/h to 5.5l at 120km/h, comfortable for driving and ideal for seeing around.
Cons: It is a game of luck with technical reliability for each car.
Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 44`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Average fuel consumption: | 16.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 36`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 180 € (~ 60 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2018 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (0 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Cons: The consumption when used by city goes up a lot.
Pros: The 110kw engine is beastly, but if you want to drive more dynamically, you can't fit it into the 10 litre consumption. After Sharan, I feel like I'm driving an aeroplane, and the potholes feel less. Good comfort in the front, could be higher seats in the back, as a taller passenger sits with their knees almost in front of their nose
Purchase year: | 2005 age of car 2 years) | Owned for | 1`000 kilometers (10 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Comfortable, spacious, do not rusts
Cons: Sensitive electronics, especially in cold.
Purchase year: | 2005 age of car 4 years) | Owned for | 100`000 kilometers (11 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.6 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 1240 € (~ 112 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend