Mitsubishi Colt 2004 reviews
Pros: Very spacious car, with adjustable back seats. Car is economical when drove with a bit of common sense. Obviously not a motorway car but holds the roads very well. Ideal for a young driver or someone living in the city or someone that does short journeys.
Cons: One blind spot beside the steering wheel and on the passenger side is the pillars that would be it.
| Purchase year: | 2018 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 18`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.8 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Ideal for woman and city.
Cons: Bad amortization. When turning to right or left its difficult to see pedestrians because of side window frame. Rearranging cannot rely on view in mirror. At rain and a glacier dirty back and rear glass. A small trunk.
| Purchase year: | 2006 new car) | Owned for | 120`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 590 € (~ 59 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Beautiful, spacious, rear seats function like the front ones, powerful engine (108 real horsepower) and brakes, reliable, unbelievably economical (4.7 l/100km outside the city).
Cons: Not so good quality interior plastic surfaces, hard suspension.
| Purchase year: | 2006 new car) | Owned for | 230`000 kilometers (16 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy and practical, 1.5 engine is lively, well equipped
Cons: front rows of very large, representing a large blind zones
fuel consumption, perhaps a little too high, but not to complain
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good car for a woman, good handling, sufficiently large.
Cons: Noisy on rural roads
| Purchase year: | 2010 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 24`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Real city car, easy to park.
Cons: High fuel consumption for a small car
| Purchase year: | 2008 new car) | Owned for | 60`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: One man's transfer vehicle
Cons: At winter -20 door freezes in, rust
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 2 years) | Owned for | 60`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2018 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 350 € (~ 58 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very comfortable interior
Cons: Lots of problems with electronics