Mitsubishi Colt 2008 reviews
Pros: Nice comfy ride on most roads, responsive engine, fairly quiet interior, a lot of passenger´s space, good visibility, high speed stability, easy to drive, reliable, good looking, sturdy interior
Cons: Not so good fuel economy, especially in short city drives is very bad, very small trunk space, bodyroll and dive on high speed turning qnd sudden braking, interior may look cheap.
Purchase year: | 2021 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Real city car, easy to park.
Cons: High fuel consumption for a small car
Purchase year: | 2008 new car) | Owned for | 60`000 kilometers (9 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very spacious car, with adjustable back seats. Car is economical when drove with a bit of common sense. Obviously not a motorway car but holds the roads very well. Ideal for a young driver or someone living in the city or someone that does short journeys.
Cons: One blind spot beside the steering wheel and on the passenger side is the pillars that would be it.
Purchase year: | 2018 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 18`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.8 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy and practical, 1.5 engine is lively, well equipped
Cons: front rows of very large, representing a large blind zones
fuel consumption, perhaps a little too high, but not to complain
Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 10 years) | Owned for | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good car for a woman, good handling, sufficiently large.
Cons: Noisy on rural roads
Purchase year: | 2010 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 24`000 kilometers (6 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Ideal for woman and city.
Cons: Bad amortization. When turning to right or left its difficult to see pedestrians because of side window frame. Rearranging cannot rely on view in mirror. At rain and a glacier dirty back and rear glass. A small trunk.
Purchase year: | 2006 new car) | Owned for | 120`000 kilometers (10 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 590 € (~ 59 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend

Pros: Beautiful, spacious, rear seats function like the front ones, powerful engine (108 real horsepower) and brakes, reliable, unbelievably economical (4.7 l/100km outside the city).
Cons: Not so good quality interior plastic surfaces, hard suspension.
Purchase year: | 2006 new car) | Owned for | 230`000 kilometers (16 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend