Kia Ceed 2010 reviews
Pros: If car technically is perfect, then fuel consumption is as low as 5l to 100. A rather capacious boot. Relatively low prices on spare parts.
Cons: Loud salon. Common repairs. Problems with central lock system. Too soft suspension - although height is a good, regularly hit bottom on pits.
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 6 years) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 750 € (~ 750 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: For this class Ceed have spacious e of interior, which is convenient if it is used for a family with children. The trunk size is acceptable and you can insert with a little pinchd baby carriages and few travel bags. The decor is tasteful and comfortable.
Cons: Noise in cabin, which sometimes seems a cumbersome, as well as fuel consumption figures have some in factory, only if outside city speed is 95 km / h.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 3`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.6 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 400 € | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: With tyres with a 68 dB noise level, interior is agreeably quiet both urban and highway traffic. This car would also counsel to second owners, because its repair costs are relatively smaller than other vehicles in this age group.
Cons: Unfortunately fuel consumption is closer to 5l/100km on highway and 7l/100km in town. In winter add additional half a litre.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 3 years) | Owned for | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 600 € (~ 600 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Excellent steering response. Consumes more in winter - over 6 liters in the city. Accelerates well. Comfortable seating position even for a height of 1.90 m. Good braking response. The headlight bulbs can be replaced in minutes.
Cons: Low suspension - 140mm, hard, pits can be felt very well. Broke front spring - both must be replaced.
| Purchase year: | 2020 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 19`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 220 € (~ 220 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good body design, very dynamic, comfortable interior, relatively economical at steady driving 90km / h, as a whole durable and reliable car with a superb stereo system:)
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 6 years) | Owned for | 20`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.3 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 780 € (~ 390 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good equipment
Cons: Poor sound insulation and very poor suspension energy efficiency (hitting through the smallest pits)
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 2 years) | Owned for | 50`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.9 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2009 new car) | Owned for | 223`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.6 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Details on cheap.
Cons: Hard. Lot of plastics inside.