Ford Mustang 2005 reviews
Pros: Rather a practical car, given that it is a coupé. Interior sufficiently large and comfortable, baggage compartment also sufficiently large.
Cons: Interior trim materials as an American, but you can forget it on hearing roar of V8. Quite pricey car service. Remember that it had to change rear axle boxes. Each paid a couple of hundred euros.
| Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 5 years) | Owned for | 7`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 15.6 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 150 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 2 years) | Owned for | 5`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: These cars mostly are not used on a day-to-day basis, their previous owners mostly gently treats car. A simple structure.
Cons: Parts must be pre-ordered. Rear-wheel drive is not best for winter. One big drawback for all Americans - as if nothing, but mounting of battery and clamps are very impractically manufactured.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 10`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 230 € (~ 115 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Beautiful, dynamic, not too complex. Have to be careful when buying, because good Mustang are not beeing sold
Cons: Rust beneath spoilers, often problems with cooling, poor, small cabin, a solid suspension
| Purchase year: | 2012 age of car 18 years) | Owned for | 10`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 650 € (~ 216 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend