Ford KA 1997 reviews
Pros: The 2002 design was superb. It climbed up an icy embankment like a persistent beetle, held its own on an icy road, climbed a steep hill with the ease of a laugh, while the Volvo, licking black smoke and tearing up the ground, roared and went nowhere. I drove all the bumpy and big puddle-filled forest roads like a small light tank. A real all-terrain vehicle. Even less blown off the road than the WW of today because of its shape. It was a pity that it had to be sold in 2009 because of the economic crisis. I am very sorry about my little white alien ship.
Cons: Rusted. The 2002 design is no longer in production. The new ones are nothing, they're the usual, you don't even want to look.
| Purchase year: | 2004 age of car 2 years) | Owned for | 120`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 15`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 280 € (~ 93 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Beautiful design, easy to park, very economical and durable, as they say, it just starts and goes, never a problem. Very good interior finish. In principle, liked everything.
| Purchase year: | 2020 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 12`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 3.8 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend