Dacia Logan 2005 reviews
Pros: Functional, good padding down pits, dunes, etc., good manoeuvre. Unlike 1.4. engine it's even have burst of speed.
Cons: On 9th year there was a defect, which failed to prevent a number of services - sometimes attempts to start that lasted an hour....
my dealer has carried out anti corrosion processing and it haven't rusted , although it has not kept in garage.
| Purchase year: | 2006 age of car 1 year) | Owned for | 110`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Simple, durable car for a reasonable price. Renault and Nissan (Clio, Notte, Megane) combination of the best components. Best kit costs 30 euros!
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 1 year) | Owned for | 166`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Relatively affordable and durable, if everything works. The purchase is relatively cheap
Cons: Rust, hard to sell
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 40`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1950 € (~ 1950 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A large salon
Cons: When Dacia rusts then cannot hear how rusts Opel :)
| Purchase year: | 2005 new car) | Owned for | 160`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend