Citroen Xsara 2000 reviews
Pros: All the best. When I bought it was in terrible condition. All sorts of guilt began to appear. We changed a lot of parts. If purchase a donor part to be make it work should be reprogrammed etc. It took a good while to get everything in order - but now I don't want another car because it's very economical, doesn't rust. On winter on the road safe with quality winter tires. The details are not expensive. Recommend to friends. I'd rather drive with my Citroen until my feet fall through the floor than with a BMW
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 7 years) | Owned for | 105`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.3 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 650 € (~ 59 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: low consumes, low cost of repairs
Cons: understēr
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 25`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 225 € (~ 112 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Cheap
Cons: Poor insulation. Box howls.
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 1`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Fuel consumption is low.
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 150 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A great car,
Cons: Nothing
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 150 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Unique