Real Mitsubishi L 200 fuel consumption
Mitsubishi L 200 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 21% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Mitsubishi L 200 produced from 1996 to 2021.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2018
Mitsubishi L 200 2018
Average real diesel consumption difference: +20%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi L 200 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3Mitsubishi L 200 2018 2.3d MT 4x4 | 7.6 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+21% |
| 2.3Mitsubishi L 200 2018 2.3d AT 4x4 | 7.8 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+21% |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L200 2.4 D 4x4 154 HP MT | 7.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km+18% |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L200 2.4 D 4x4 154 HP AT | 8.6 l/100km | |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L200 2.4 D 181 HP AT 4x4 | 8.6 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km+22% |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L 200 2018 2.4 MIVEC 181 HP MT 4x4 | 8.9 l/100km | |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L 200 2018 2.4 MIVEC 181 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L 200 2018 2.4 MIVEC 181 HP AT | 10.6 l/100km |
2015
Mitsubishi L 200 2015
Average real diesel consumption difference: +31%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi L 200 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4Mitsubishi L200 2.4 DI-D 154 HP MT 4x4 | 7.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km+28% |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L200 2.4 DI-D 154 HP AT 4x4 | 7.1 l/100km | |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L200 2.4 DI-D 181 HP AT 4x4 | 7.5 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+44% |
| 2.4Mitsubishi L 200 2015 2.4d 181 HP MT 4x4 | 7.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+21% |
2010
Mitsubishi L 200 2010
Average real diesel consumption difference: +29%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi L 200 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab 2.5 DI-D 4WD 136 HP MT | 8.3 l/100km | |
| 2.5Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab 2.5 DI-D 4WD 136 HP AT | 8.7 l/100km | |
| 2.5Mitsubishi L 200 2010 2.5 HP DI-D 178 HP MT 4x4 | 7.7 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+29% |
| 2.5Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab 2.5 DI-D 4WD 178 HP AT | 8.7 l/100km |
2006
Mitsubishi L 200 2006
Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi L 200 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5Mitsubishi L 200 2006 2.5 TD 4WD 136 HP MT | 8.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+5% |
| 2.5Mitsubishi L 200 2006 2.5 TD 4WD 136 HP AT | 9.5 l/100km | |
| 2.5Mitsubishi L200 2.5 TD 4WD 168 HP MT | 8.0 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.