A powerful, compact, in winter no problems
read all Ford Puma reviews
This generation of Ford Puma has been produced from October, 1997 to November, 2002. We can provide information about 3 modifications of this generation. The car has been produced only with front wheel drive.
This Ford is available with three petrol engines with displacement from 1.4 to 1.7 litres and power of from 90 to 125 horsepower.
The car is available with only with manual gearbox.
Ford Puma average fuel consumption in combined cycle is from 7.2 to 7.4 litres per 100km. The most economical Ford Puma version is Ford Puma 1.4i 16V, consuming 7.2 litres of petrol per 100km.
Ford Puma CO2 emissions are from 171 to 178 grams per kilometer. Ford Puma version with the lowest CO2 emissions is Ford Puma 1.4i 16V, which produces 171 grams of CO2 per one kilometer.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 9.2 seconds has Ford Puma 1.7i 16V version, conversely the tardiest one is Ford Puma 1.4i 16V reaching this speed only in 11.9 seconds.
Lenght of Ford Puma is 398 cm, it is small car.
This Ford is very cheap for its class - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 850 $. According to user reviews, average Ford Puma repair costs are 10 $ per year. Below you will find more detailed information about Ford Puma prices and costs.
In user reviews Ford Puma received average grade 9.0 (from 10), which is good rating, on average cars of this age are rated only 7.6. All authors of reviews would recommend Ford Puma to the friend.
Ford Puma modifications
Modification | Engine | Power | Fuel cons. |
---|---|---|---|
Ford Puma 1.4i 16V Jan 1998 — Aug 2000 | 1.4 Petrol | 90 HP | 7.2 l/100km |
Ford Puma 1.6i 16V Aug 2000 — Nov 2002 | 1.6 Petrol | 103 HP | 7.3 l/100km |
Ford Puma 1.7i 16V Oct 1997 — Nov 2002 | 1.7 Petrol | 125 HP | 7.4 l/100km |
Ford Puma prices
Ford Puma coupe price in Latvia is from 220 $ to 1900 $.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Ford Puma price is below average - Ford Puma is approximately for 57 percents cheaper then average coupes of this age (compare coupes 1997 - 2002 prices). Despite of relatively low price Ford Puma quality is above average (see below), so this Ford can be a good buy.
Year | Lowest price ($) | Average price ($) | Highest price ($) | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | 650 | 900 | 1200 | |
2000 | 330 | 1100 | 1900 | |
1999 | 440 | 800 | 1100 | |
1998 | 440 | 900 | 1400 | |
1997 | 220 | 650 | 1200 |
Ford Puma total costs of ownership
To calculate the Ford Puma total running costs, including the purchase, insurance, maintenance costs as well as taxes and other costs, click year of production
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Ford Puma mileage
To estimate approximate Ford Puma mileage, please choose production year
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Ford Puma coupe features (options)
Percentage of Ford Puma with corresponding feature (option)
75% Metallic paint
47% Electrically adjustable seats
19% Adjustable steering wheel
18%
Ford Puma coupe photo images
Ford Puma reviews
Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 58`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 28.86 $ (~ 7 $ per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Extremely compact and cost-effective in terms of use of car. And definetely with his pizzazz.
For one - MAX 2 people, but not family car.
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 25`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 399.6 $ (~ 399 $ per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
A powerful, compact, in winter no problems
A sizable fuel consumption, a noisy salon.