Ford Puma 1997 vs Opel Tigra 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Puma is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Opel Tigra has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 90 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 157 NM | 125 - 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | 10.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 7.4 | 7.3 - 8.2 | |
|
Ford Puma petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Tigra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Ford Puma is larger. Ford Puma is 6 cm longer than the Opel Tigra, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 425 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Tigra, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`337 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |