Real Suzuki Swift fuel consumption
Suzuki Swift real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 17% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 21% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 14% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Suzuki Swift produced from 2004 to 2021. For Suzuki Swift produced up to 2013 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +17%, while for those produced after 2013 it is on average +22%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017
Suzuki Swift 2017
Average real petrol consumption difference: +25%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Suzuki Swift versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Suzuki Swift 2017 1.0 BoosterJet 102 HP AT | 5.0 l/100km | |
| 1.0Suzuki Swift 2017 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 HP MT | 4.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+30% |
| 1.0Suzuki Swift 2017 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 HP MT | 4.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+22% |
| 1.0Suzuki Swift 2017 1.0 112 HP MT | 4.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+30% |
| 1.0Suzuki Swift 2017 1.0 112 HP MT | 4.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+22% |
| 1.0Suzuki Swift 2017 1.0 112 HP AT | 5.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+20% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2017 1.2 90 HP MT | 4.3 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km+21% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2017 1.2 90 HP AT | 4.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+30% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2017 1.2 4х4 90 HP AT 4x4 | 4.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+32% |
| 1.4SUZUKI Swift 2017 Sport 1.4L MT | 5.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+15% |
| 1.4Suzuki Swift 2018 Sport 1.4 AT | 6.1 l/100km |
2013
Suzuki Swift 2013
Average real petrol consumption difference: +15%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Suzuki Swift versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2013 1.2 94 HP MT | 5.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+20% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2013 1.2 94 HP AT | 5.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+24% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2013 1.2 4WD 94 HP MT | 5.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+9% |
| 1.6Suzuki Swift 2013 1.6 136 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+14% |
| 1.6Suzuki Swift 2015 Sport 1.6 136 HP MT | 6.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+9% |
| 1.6Suzuki Swift 2015 Sport 1.6 136 HP AT | 6.1 l/100km |
2013
Suzuki Swift 2013
Average real petrol consumption difference: +19%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Suzuki Swift versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2013 1.2 AT | 5.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+24% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2013 1.2 MT | 5.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+20% |
| 1.6Suzuki Swift 2013 1.6 MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+14% |
2010
Suzuki Swift 2010
Average real petrol consumption difference: +24% Average real diesel consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Suzuki Swift versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2010 1.2 MT | Petrol | 5.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+24% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2010 1.2 AT | Petrol | 5.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+25% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2010 1.2 1.3 DDiS MT | Diesel | 4.2 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km+14% |
2010
Suzuki Swift 2010
Average real petrol consumption difference: +24%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Suzuki Swift versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2010 1.2 5MT MT | 5.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+24% |
2004
Suzuki Swift 2004
Average real petrol consumption difference: +16% Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Suzuki Swift versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2004 1.2 1.3 DDiS MT | Diesel | 4.6 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km+13% |
| 1.2Suzuki Swift 2004 1.2 1.3 DDiS AT | Diesel | 4.6 l/100km | |
| 1.3Suzuki Swift 2004 1.3 i 16V 92 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+10% |
| 1.3Suzuki Swift 2004 1.3 i 16V 92 HP AT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+15% |
| 1.3Suzuki Swift 2004 1.3i 92 HP AT 4x4 | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+15% |
| 1.3Suzuki Swift 2006 1.3 4Grip 92 HP MT 4x4 | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+5% |
| 1.5Suzuki Swift 2005 1.5 MT | Petrol | 6.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+20% |
| 1.5Suzuki Swift 2005 1.5 AT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+31% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.