Real Opel Calibra fuel consumption
Opel Calibra real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 5% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
1994
Opel Calibra 1994
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Opel Calibra versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1994 2.0 8V 115 HP MT | 8.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1994 2.0 8V 115 HP AT | 8.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1994 2.0 16V ECOTEC 136 HP MT | 7.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+9% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1994 2.0 16V ECOTEC 136 HP AT | 7.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1994 2.0 16V ECOTEC 136 HP AT 4x4 | 9.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1994 2.0 16V Turbo 204 HP MT 4x4 | 9.0 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+8% |
| 2.5Opel Calibra 1994 2.5 V6 ECOTEC MT | 8.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+6% |
| 2.5Opel Calibra 1994 2.5 V6 ECOTEC AT | 8.7 l/100km |
1990
Opel Calibra 1990
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Opel Calibra versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1990 2.0i 4x4 115 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km-1% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1990 2.0i 115 HP MT | 8.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km0% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1990 2.0i 115 HP AT | 8.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1990 2.0i 16V 150 HP MT | 7.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1990 2.0i 16V 4x4 150 HP MT | 8.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+2% |
| 2.0Opel Calibra 1992 2.0i Turbo 4x4 204 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+15% |
| 2.5Opel Calibra 1993 2.5i-V6 MT | 10.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km0% |
| 2.5Opel Calibra 1993 2.5i-V6 AT | 11.2 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.