Real Volkswagen Vento fuel consumption

Volkswagen Vento real fuel consumption by user reviews is similar compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.

1992 Volkswagen Vento 1992 Average real diesel consumption difference: minor

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volkswagen Vento versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.4Volkswagen Vento 1995 1.4 MT	6.6 l/100km
1.6Volkswagen Vento 1993 1.6 MT	7.3 l/100km	7.5 l/100km+3%
1.8Volkswagen Vento 1992 1.8 75 HP MT	7.6 l/100km	7.9 l/100km+4%
1.8Volkswagen Vento 1992 1.8 75 HP AT	9.5 l/100km	9.4 l/100km-1%
1.8Volkswagen Vento 1997 1.8 75 HP MT	7.6 l/100km	8.1 l/100km+7%
1.8Volkswagen Vento 1992 1.8 90 HP MT	8.0 l/100km	8.5 l/100km+6%
1.8Volkswagen Vento 1992 1.8 90 HP AT	9.2 l/100km	9.6 l/100km+4%
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1992 1.9 Diesel 64 HP MT	5.9 l/100km	6.1 l/100km+3%
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1995 1.9 SDI 64 HP MT	5.1 l/100km	5.5 l/100km+8%
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1992 1.9 TD 75 HP MT	6.1 l/100km	6.1 l/100km0%
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1994 1.9 TDI 90 HP MT	5.0 l/100km	5.0 l/100km0%
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1996 1.9 TDI 90 HP AT	5.0 l/100km
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1996 1.9 TDI 110 HP MT	5.0 l/100km	5.2 l/100km+4%
1.9Volkswagen Vento 1996 1.9 TDI 110 HP AT	6.4 l/100km
2.0Volkswagen Vento 1992 2.0 MT	8.1 l/100km	8.1 l/100km0%
2.0Volkswagen Vento 1992 2.0 AT	9.2 l/100km
2.8Volkswagen Vento 1992 2.8 VR6 MT	10.6 l/100km	11.1 l/100km+5%
2.8Volkswagen Vento 1993 2.8 VR6 AT	11.6 l/100km

Do you own a Volkswagen Vento? Please submit your fuel consumption!

Real fuel consumption of other carmakers

Alfa Romeo

Audi

BMW

Chevrolet

Chrysler

Citroen

Dacia

Dodge

Fiat

Ford

Honda

Hyundai

Infiniti

Isuzu

Jaguar

Jeep

Kia

Land Rover

Lexus

Mazda

Mercedes

Mini

Mitsubishi

Nissan

Opel

Peugeot

Porsche

Renault

Rover

SAAB

Seat

Skoda

Smart

Subaru

Suzuki

Toyota

Volkswagen

Volvo

The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.