Real Hyundai Accent fuel consumption
Hyundai Accent real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 9% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 12% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 6% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Hyundai Accent produced from 1999 to 2018.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2006
Hyundai Accent 2006 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4Hyundai Accent 2006 1.4i MT | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+19% |
| 1.4Hyundai Accent 2006 1.4i AT | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2006 1.6i MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+9% |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2006 1.6i AT | 7.0 l/100km |
2005
Hyundai Accent 2005 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14% Average real diesel consumption difference: +17%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4Hyundai Accent 2005 1.4i MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+19% |
| 1.4Hyundai Accent 2005 1.4i AT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 2005 1.5 CRDi MT | Diesel | 4.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+17% |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2006 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+9% |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2006 1.6i AT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km |
2003
Hyundai Accent 2003 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10% Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2003 1.3i 84 HP MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+15% |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2003 1.3i 84 HP AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2004 1.3i 84 HP MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+6% |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2004 1.3i 84 HP AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 2003 1.5 CRDi MT | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+2% |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2003 1.6i 105 HP MT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2003 1.6i 105 HP AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2004 1.6i 105 HP MT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2004 1.6i 105 HP AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km |
2003
Hyundai Accent 2003 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8% Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2003 1.3i MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+8% |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2003 1.3i AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 2003 1.5 CRDi MT | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+2% |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2003 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2003 1.6i AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km |
2003
Hyundai Accent 2003 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10% Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2003 1.3i MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+10% |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 2003 1.3i AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 2003 1.5 CRDi MT | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+2% |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2003 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Hyundai Accent 2003 1.6i AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km |
1999
Hyundai Accent 1999 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 1999 1.3i MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+16% |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5i 90 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+1% |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5i 90 HP AT | 7.8 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 2000 1.5 i 16V 102 HP MT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+15% |
1999
Hyundai Accent 1999 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 1999 1.3i MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+16% |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5i 90 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+7% |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5i 90 HP AT | 7.8 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 2000 1.5 i 16V 102 HP MT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+15% |
1999
Hyundai Accent 1999 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Hyundai Accent versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 1999 1.3 i 12V 75 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+16% |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 1999 1.3i 86 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+19% |
| 1.3Hyundai Accent 1999 1.3 i 12V 86 HP AT | 6.1 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5i 90 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+7% |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5 i 12V 92 HP AT | 7.8 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5 i 16V GT 99 HP MT | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5 i 16V 102 HP MT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+15% |
| 1.5Hyundai Accent 1999 1.5 i 16V 102 HP AT | 6.7 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.