Real Fiat Stilo fuel consumption
Fiat Stilo real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 10% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2006
Fiat Stilo 2006 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Stilo versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Fiat Stilo 2006 1.4 16v MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+1% |
1.6Fiat Stilo 2006 1.6 16v MT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+1% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2006 1.9 JTD 120 MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km+9% |
2006
Fiat Stilo 2006 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Stilo versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.6Fiat Stilo 2006 Multi Wagon 1.6 16v MT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km-1% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2006 Multi Wagon 1.9 Multijet 120 MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km+5% |
2003
Fiat Stilo 2003 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Stilo versions are shown in the table below.
2001
Fiat Stilo 2001 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Stilo versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.2Fiat Stilo 2002 1.2 80 16v MT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+3% |
1.4Fiat Stilo 2004 1.4 16v 95 HP MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+4% |
1.4Fiat Stilo 2005 1.4 16v 95 HP MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km-1% |
1.6Fiat Stilo 2001 1.6 16v MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+3% |
1.7Fiat Stilo 2001 1.7 1.8 16v MT | Petrol | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+1% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2002 1.9 JTD 80 80 HP MT | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+9% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2004 1.9 JTD 80 80 HP MT | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+11% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2005 1.9 JTD 100 100 HP MT | Diesel | 5.8 l/100km | |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2001 1.9 JTD 115 115 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+11% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2004 1.9 JTD 16v 140 140 HP MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+13% |
2.4Fiat Stilo 2001 2.4 20v 170 HP AT | Petrol | 9.8 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+1% |
2.4Fiat Stilo 2004 2.4 20v 170 HP AT | Petrol | 9.8 l/100km |
2001
Fiat Stilo 2001 3 door hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Stilo versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.2Fiat Stilo 2002 1.2 80 16v MT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+6% |
1.4Fiat Stilo 2004 1.4 16v MT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km0% |
1.6Fiat Stilo 2001 1.6 16v MT | Petrol | 7.3 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+5% |
1.7Fiat Stilo 2001 1.7 1.8 16v MT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+2% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2002 1.9 JTD 80 80 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+11% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2004 1.9 JTD 80 80 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+13% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2005 1.9 JTD 100 100 HP MT | Diesel | 5.8 l/100km | |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2001 1.9 JTD 115 115 HP MT | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+13% |
1.9Fiat Stilo 2004 1.9 JTD 16v 140 140 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km+19% |
2.4Fiat Stilo 2001 2.4 20v AT | Petrol | 9.7 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+2% |
2.4Fiat Stilo 2003 2.4 20v MT | Petrol | 9.7 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+3% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.