Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Highlander is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Highlander engine produces 22 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.5 | |
| Toyota Highlander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Highlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus RX | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Highlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 35 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 955 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 1415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 5.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`625 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |